ISSN : 3023-7505
  • Home
  • About The Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Contact
Current Issue
Ahead Of Print
Archive
Search
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Current Minimal Invasive Angle Procedures Without Implants for the Treatment of Glaucoma...
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
TJ-CEO 2023 , Vol 18 , Num 3
Abstract Free Full Text Similar Articles Mail to Author
Comparison of Surgically Induced Astigmatism after Trabeculectomy and Ex-Press Glaucoma Implant
Saadet GultekinIrgat|1, Alpaslan Koc2, Orhan Altunel1, Fatih Ozcura3
1Assoc. Prof., Kütahya Health Sciences University, Medicine School, Ophthalmology Department, Kütahya, Türkiye
2MD, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Medicine School, Ophthalmology Department, Kütahya, Türkiye
3Prof. Dr., Kütahya Health Sciences University, Medicine School, Ophthalmology Department, Kütahya, Türkiye
DOI : 10.37844/glau.cat.2023.18.16 Purpose: To compare surgical and refractive outcomes in patients undergoing trabeculectomy and Ex-Press implantation surgery.

Materials and Methods: The study included 40 eyes underwent trabeculectomy (n=20) and Ex-Press implant (n=20) due to uncontrolled glaucoma. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and keratometry measurements were evaluated preoperatively and on postoperative months 1, 3 and 6 months. During the follow-up, keratometric astigmatism values and surgery-induced astigmatism (SIA) values calculated with Eğrilmez?s vector analysis program were analyzed using statistical comparisons.

Results: There were no significant differences in mean age, gender, laterality and glaucoma type (p>0.05) between study groups. Again, no significant differences were found in mean baseline BCVA (0,35±0,36, 0,46±0,33 logMAR), IOP (32,10±7,8, 37,10±8,3 mmHg), keratometry (43, 93±1,16, 43,71±0,61 D), and corneal astigmatism (1,10±0,61, 0,83±0,40 D) (p>0.05) values between trabeculectomy and Ex-Press implant groups. In the Ex-Press group, postoperative IOP reduction was significantly greater on month 1(14,10±4,2, 10,95±2,2 mmHg, p=0.013), but no significant difference was found between the two groups at remaining time points (p>0.05). Corneal astigmatism increased in both groups in the first month, but this increase was not statistically significant (p>0.05). There was no significant difference SIA vector size during the 6-months follow-up between groups (p>0.05). While oblique astigmatism was present in the trabeculectomy group at baseline, rule-compliant astigmatism was observed on postoperative month 6. In the Ex-Press group, the rule-compliant component persisted throughout follow-up period.

Conclusions: No significant difference occurred in IOP, visual outcomes, and astigmatism change after trabeculectomy and Express implantation. Keywords : Induced astigmatism, Trabeculectomy, Ex-Press, Vectorial analysis

PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
Home
About The Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Contact