ISSN : 3023-7505
  • Home
  • About The Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Contact
Current Issue
Ahead Of Print
Archive
Search
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Current Minimal Invasive Angle Procedures Without Implants for the Treatment of Glaucoma...
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
TJ-CEO 2017 , Vol 12 , Num 2
Turkish Abstract Abstract PDF Similar Articles Mail to Author
Properties of Corneal Biomechanics in Anisometropic Amblyopia Cases
Mert ŞİMŞEK1, Emrullah BEYAZYILDIZ2, Özlem BEYAZYILDIZ2, Merve İNANÇ1, Pelin YILMAZBAŞ3
1Asist. Dr., Ulucanlar Göz Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Göz Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi, Ankara - TÜRKİYE
2Uz. Dr., Ulucanlar Göz Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Göz Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi, Ankara - TÜRKİYE
3Prof. Dr., Ulucanlar Göz Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Göz Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi, Ankara - TÜRKİYE
Purpose: The determination of corneal biomechanical properties in cases of anisometropic amblyopia and comparison of amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes of the same patients.

Materials and Methods: The amblyopic and fellow eyes of 30 anisometropic amblyopic patients who were admitted to the eye clinic of Ulucanlar Eye Education and Research Hospital, between the dates of January to June 2014 were included to study. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) values were determined by ocular response analyser (ORA, Reichert;USA).

Results: The mean CH value was 10.4±1.7 (7.8-14.8) mmHg in healthy eyes and 13.3±3.7 (8.8-22.7) mmHg in amblyopic eyes. The mean CRF value was 9.9±1.6 (6.2-13.4) mmHg in healthy eyes and 10.0±1.5 (6.3-13.2) in amblyopic eyes. The mean IOPcc value was 14.6±3.6 (7.6-22.1) in healthy eyes and 14.5±3.6 (8.8-22.7) in amblyopic eyes. The mean CH value and the mean CRF value were higher (p=0,001, p<0,001 respectively), and the mean IOPcc value was lower (p<0,001) in amblyopic eyes compared with fellow eyes of patients. There were no statistically signifi cant difference between the amblyopic and fellow eyes of patients in the terms of mean IOPg values and mean CCT values (p=0.82, p=0,44 respectively).

Conclusion: It was observed that CH and IOPcc values were signifi cantly low in amblyopic eyes compared to fellow eyes of the same patients, whereas CRF values were high. However, there were no signifi cant differences in CCT and IOPg values. Keywords : Anisometropic amblyopia, ocular response analyzer, corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, cornea-compensated intraocular pressure

PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
Home
About The Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Contact