ISSN : 3023-7505
  • Home
  • About The Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Contact
Current Issue
Ahead Of Print
Archive
Search
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Current Minimal Invasive Angle Procedures Without Implants for the Treatment of Glaucoma...
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
TJ-CEO 2016 , Vol 11 , Num 4
Turkish Abstract Abstract PDF Similar Articles Mail to Author
Intraocular Pressure Increase After Penetrating Keratoplasty
Bora YÜKSEL1, Selda TOKAT2, Umut Duygu UZUNEL1, Tuncay KÜSBECİ3
1M.D. Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Eye Clinic, Izmir/TURKEY
2M.D. Asistant, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Eye Clinic, Izmir/TURKEY
3M.D. Associate Professor, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Eye Clinic, Izmir/TURKEY
Purpose: To investigate the incidence, occurrence period, progression and risk factors for intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation after Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK) as well as its management and treatment results.

Materials and Methods: Data of 342 eyes who had PK between 2003-2014 with a regular follow-up and IOP measurements of at least 1 year were reviewed retrospectively. 102 eyes with a rise in IOP exceeding 21 mmHg during follow-up were spared and analysed.

Results: IOP increase occurred in 29.8% of the patients. Mean time of occurrence was 16.8±13.3 (2-52) post-operative week. Mean age was 60.6±17.6 (14-83). Number of patients under age 40 was 30 (27.0%). Mean preoperative IOP of 14.6±2.9 (5-20) mmHg increased to 25.7±4.1 (22-45) mmHg. Combined procedures during PK had no significant effect on postoperative pressure elevation (p=0.076, Chi-square test). Age, gender and trephine diameters were not significant risk factors. However, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy with an incidence of 48.1% was found as the most significant risk factor (p=0.002, Ki-kare testi). IOP was controlled with one topical agent in 44 eyes (43.1%), with fixed combination in 51 eyes (50.0%), in 6 eyes (5.9%) which were resistant to medical therapy trabeculectomy was performed in eye (1.0%) Ahmed Glaucoma Device was implanted.

Conclusion: IOP elevation is a serious complication after PK which is not rare. Especially pseudophakic bullous keratopathy is a significant risk factor. In order to protect graft clarity and optic disc functions, IOP should be monitored closely after PK and aggressively treated if found to be high. Keywords : Penetrating keratoplasty, intraocular pressure, trabeculectomy

PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
Home
About The Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Contact