ISSN : 3023-7505
  • Home
  • About The Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Contact
Current Issue
Ahead Of Print
Archive
Search
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Current Minimal Invasive Angle Procedures Without Implants for the Treatment of Glaucoma...
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
TJ-CEO 2016 , Vol 11 , Num 2
Turkish Abstract Abstract PDF Similar Articles Mail to Author
Optic Nerve Head Topographic Measurements and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Patients with Physiological Macrodiscs, Normal and Glaucomatous Optic Discs
Funda Ebru ÖNMEZ1, Banu ŞATANA2, Çiğdem ALTAN2, Ömer Faruk YILMAZ3
1M.D. Asistant Professor, Sakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Sakarya/TURKEY
2M.D. Associate Professor, Beyoglu Training and Research Hospital, Eye Clinic, Istanbul/TURKEY
3M.D. Professor, Beyoglu Training and Research Hospital, Eye Clinic, Istanbul/TURKEY
Purpose: To evaluate the parameters of optic nerve head (ONH) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) in healthy patients with large optic disc area and to compare these parameters with those of the normal and early glaucoma patients.

Material and Methods: Ninety two eyes with physiological macrodiscs (PM), age-matched 92 eyes with normal eyes and 50 eyes with early glaucoma (EG) findings were enrolled. After a complete ophthalmic evaluation, measurement of optic nerve head parameters and RNFL thickness using OCT was performed in all subjects. Optic disc areas larger than 2.80 mm2 were accepted as macrodiscs. All OCT parameters were compared between normal-sized discs and macrodiscs. Central corneal thickness, intra ocular pressure and axial length measurements were found to be similar between 3 groups.

Results: Mean optic disc area of PM and EG were similar and larger than the control group. Rim area of EG group was thinner than the other groups (p=0.022, p=0.0001). Also, EG group had larger horizontal cup disc ratio, vertical cup disc ratio and cup disc area ratio (p>0.001). Average,superior and inferior RNFL thicknesses were thinner in the EG group (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Macrodisc may have a macrocup and should not be misdiagnosed as glaucoma. The present study showed that macrodiscs are identical to normal-sized discs in terms of rim area and RNFL thickness. We suggest that these 2 OCT parameters can help to differentiate a healthy macrodisc from a glaucomatous optic disc. Keywords : Optical coherence tomography, glaucoma, large optic disc, macrodisc, optic nerve head analysis

PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
Home
About The Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Contact