ISSN : 3023-7505
  • Home
  • About The Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Contact
Current Issue
Ahead Of Print
Archive
Search
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Current Minimal Invasive Angle Procedures Without Implants for the Treatment of Glaucoma...
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
TJ-CEO 2012 , Vol 7 , Num 4
Turkish Abstract Abstract PDF Similar Articles Mail to Author
Comparison of Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements by the Galilei Dual-Scheimpflug Analyzer and Conventional A-Scan Ultrasound
Volkan YETER1, Nurşen ARITÜRK2
1M.D., Erzincan University, Mengücek Training and Research Hospital, Eye Clinic, Erzincan/TURKEY
2M.D. Professor, Ondokuzmayıs University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Samsun/TURKEY
Purpose: To compare the anterior chamber depth measurements (ACD) obtained by the Galilei Dual-Scheimpflug Analyzer (GSA) and conventional A-scan ultrasound in healthy subjects.

Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, ACD measurements of 80 eyes of 43 healthy subjects (30 adults and 13 children; 21 females and 22 males; mean age: 27.86±15.32 years) were respectively measured by GSA (Ziemer Group, Switzerland) and ultrasound. The data was analyzed statistically by the Paired-T test, Bland-Altman plot, and Pearson correlation test to assess the agreement of the measurements.

Results: The mean ACD values obtained by GSA and ultrasound were 3.58±0.29 mm and 3.47±0.33 mm, respectively. The mean difference between the ACD measurements obtained by ultrasound and GSA (GSA minus Ultrasound) was 0.11±0.14 mm and the difference between the ACD measurements of these devices was statistically significant (p<0.001). There was high correlation between the ACD measurements of GSA and those of ultrasound (r=0.90; p<0.001).

Conclusions: The ACD measurements of GSA and conventional A-scan ultrasound are highly correlated. GSA measures the ACD on average 0.11 mm longer than conventional ultrasound and this difference may be regarded as clinically insignificant. Keywords : Anterior chamber depth, dual-Scheimpflug, ultrasound

PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
Home
About The Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Contact