ISSN : 3023-7505
  • Home
  • About The Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Contact
Current Issue
Ahead Of Print
Archive
Search
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Current Minimal Invasive Angle Procedures Without Implants for the Treatment of Glaucoma...
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
TJ-CEO 2014 , Vol 9 , Num 2
Turkish Abstract Abstract PDF Similar Articles Mail to Author
Comparison of Anterior Chamber Depth and Axial Length Measurements by the IOLMaster and A-Scan Ultrasound
İbrahim TUNCER1, Mehmet Özgür ZENGİN2, Eyyüp KARAHAN1
1M.D. Special Alfa Eye Hospital, İzmir/TURKEY
2M.D., İzmir University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İzmir/TURKEY
Purpose: To comparison of anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) measurements by the IOLMaster and A-scan ultrasound.

Material and Method: Sixty right eyes of 60 patients (29 male and 31 female) were included in the study. Firstly, ACD and AL were measured IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), after that A-scan ultrasound (SW-1000, Suowei Co., Tianjin, China) measurements were performed. Results were elaborated using Pearson’s correlation and paired-t test.

Results: The mean age of patients were 24.6±4.90 years (16-32). Mean values and ranges of ACD and AL were as follows respectively, 3.19±0.28 mm (2.63-3.66) and 22.85±0.75 mm (21.93-24.87) for IOLMaster, and 2.97±0.29 mm (2.46-3.35) and 22.76±1.00 mm (21.68-25.50) for A-scan ultrasound. Mean difference in ACD and AL measurements for IOLMaster was 0.22 mm and 0.09 mm higher than A-scan ultrasound, respectively (p<0.0001 and p=0.01, respectively). The correlation between two methods was statistically significant (r=0.922, p<0.0001 and r=0.985, p<0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion: Although there was high correlation between measurements, statistically significance was found between two methods. Optic biometry should be preferred since reducing the risk of potential refractive error associated with surgery. Keywords : IOLMaster, A-scan ultrasound, anterior chamber depth, axial length

PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
Home
About The Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Contact