ISSN : 3023-7505
  • Home
  • About The Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Contact
Current Issue
Ahead Of Print
Archive
Search
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Current Minimal Invasive Angle Procedures Without Implants for the Treatment of Glaucoma...
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
TJ-CEO 2013 , Vol 8 , Num 4
Turkish Abstract Abstract PDF Similar Articles Mail to Author
Comparison of Rebound Tonometer, Dynamic Contour Tonometer, Tonopen XL with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Normal Eyes
Altan Atakan ÖZCAN1, Emine ÇİLOĞLU2, Ebru ESEN3, İsmail Hakkı ÜNDAR4, İnan HARBİYELİ5, Firas ŞİMŞEK6
1M.D. Professor, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Adana/TURKEY
2M.D., Numune Training and Research Hospital, Eye Clinic, Adana/TURKEY
3M.D. Asistant Professor, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Adana/TURKEY
4M.D., Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Adana/TURKEY
5M.D., Ermenek State Hospital, Eye Clinic, Konya/TURKEY
6M.D., Antakya State Hospital, Eye Clinic, Hatay/TURKEY
Purpose: This clinical study was conducted to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), Rebound tonometry (Icare), Dynamic Contour tonometer (Pascal) and TonoPen XL (TP), to evaluate the effect of central corneal thickness (CCK) on IOP measurements.

Materials and Methods: The study included 39 healthy subjects. IOP measurements were taken using Icare, Pascal, TP and GAT, respectively. CCK was measured with ultrasound pachymetry. To compare the measurements; the analysis of percentage change and Pearson correlation, the average, median, standart deviation and minimum-maximum values were calculated. The agreement between 2 different devices was assessed by use of the Bland-Altman method.

Results: The average CCK was 528±16 μm (483-555 μm). The mean IOP, with Icare was 13.8±2.1 mmHg, with Pascal DCT was 14.0±2.2 mmHg, with TP was 14.0±3.4 mmHg, with GAT was 13.8±2.4 mmHg. There was no significant difference statistically between the IOP measurements of all methods (p>0.05). The percentage of the Icare, Pascal DCT and TP readings, which were all within ±3 mmHg of the GAT readings were respectively 66.6%, 61.5%, 56.4%. There was an agreement between corrected GAT values and the other tonometry values on the Bland-Altman graphs. There was no correlation between IOP measurements and CCT.

Conclusion: In our study, there was no significant difference between the four methods of IOP measurements. Icare tonometry does not require topical anesthesia, is easy to use, the measurement is fast. So, it can be used as a relevant tonometry in clinical setting. Keywords : Icare, pascal tonometry, tonopen, goldman applanation tonometry, central corneal thickness

PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
Home
About The Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Contact