ISSN : 3023-7505
  • Home
  • About The Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Contact
Current Issue
Ahead Of Print
Archive
Search
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Current Minimal Invasive Angle Procedures Without Implants for the Treatment of Glaucoma...
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
TJ-CEO 2012 , Vol 7 , Num 4
Turkish Abstract Abstract PDF Similar Articles Mail to Author
Comparison of Immersion Ultrasound Biometry and Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation
Semra AKKAYA TURHAN1, Ebru TOKER2
1M.D. Asistant, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İstanbul/TURKEY
2M.D. Professor, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İstanbul/TURKEY
Purpose: To evaluate the precision of the biometric measurements for intraocular lens power calculations obtained by an optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer and an immersion ultrasound biometry (IUB).

Materials and Methods: In a prospective study, biometric measurements were taken with OLCR and IUB+automated keratometry in 126 eyes of 99 patients. SRK-II, SRK/T, Holladay, Hoffer Q, Haigis formulas were used to calculate the power of the implanted IOL. Measurements of axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratometric readings (K), and the recommended lens power to achieve emmetropia obtained with OLCR were compared with those obtained with IUB. The results were evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses and Spearman correlation calculations.

Results: High correlations for AL, ACD, and K measurements were observed between the two devices (r=0.99, 0.87 and 0.87, respectively, p<0.0001). The axial length measured with OLCR was slightly longer than that measured with IUB (mean difference (MD) 0.06 mm, 95% LoA: 0.40, -0.28), ACD was shorter (MD -0.2 mm, 95% LoA: 0.32, -0.73), K readings were flatter (MD -0.6 D, 95% LoA: 0.8,-0.20). The recommended lens power to achieve emmetropia (OLCR-IUB) was higher for SRK- II (MD 0.2 D, 9%5 LoA -1.5,1.9), SRK/T (MD 0.7 D, 95% LoA -2.7,1.3), Holladay (MD 0.6 D, 95% LoA 2.1, -1.0) and Hoffer Q (MD 0.6 D, 95% LoA 2.4, -1.3), and was lower for Haigis (MD -0.6 D, 95% LoA 1.5, -2.8), (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Although there was high correlation between biometric measurements and IOL power calculations, the mean differences between the two biometry devices were significant. Keywords : Cataract, IOL power calculation, optical biometry, ultrasound biometry

PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
Home
About The Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Contact