ISSN : 3023-7505
  • Home
  • About The Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Contact
Current Issue
Ahead Of Print
Archive
Search
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Current Minimal Invasive Angle Procedures Without Implants for the Treatment of Glaucoma...
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
TJ-CEO 2011 , Vol 6 , Num 2
Turkish Abstract Abstract PDF Similar Articles Mail to Author
Multifocal Apodized Diffractive Intraocular Lens Implantation: Three Years’ Results
Bengü EKİNCİ KÖKTEKİR1, Bekir Sıtkı ASLAN2
1Selcuk Üniversitesi Selçuklu Tıp Fakültesi, Göz Hastalıkları AD, Konya, Yrd. Doç. Dr.
2TOBB MESA Hastanesi, Göz Hastalıkları Kliniği, Ankara, Uzm. Dr.
Purpose: To evaluate visual performance in patients who had multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, regarding age, preoperative astigmatism, and preoperative visual acuity.
Materials and Methods: This analysis comprised the right eyes of 220 patients who had bilateral implantation of bilateral AcrySof SN60D3 IOL. The best corrected distance visual acuity, distance-corrected (near intermediate, far) visual acuities, distance glare test under mesopic conditions, and patient satisfaction were measured. The results were compared according to age, preoperative astigmatism, and preoperative visual acuity.
Results: For the comparison of age, in the first group, age younger than 65 years, the results were more satisfactory than they were in the second group, except for the halos. In the grouping according to preoperative astigmatism, the first group had 0.5 diopter (D) or less preoperative astigmatism, while the second group had more than 0.5 D; and mean distance logMAR and mean halo values were better in the first group. For preoperative visual acuity, the first group had over 0.5 logMAR preoperative visual acuity, while the second group had 0.5 logMAR. For this comparison, in the first group, near vision logMAR, satisfaction with near sight, satisfaction overall, and glare test results were better.
Conclusions: The AcrySof Natural ReSTOR IOL provided good visual performance at distance and near. The younger age group had better compliance with the lens while halos were still a problem. Astigmatism less than 0.5 D gave favorable results, while preoperative good vision had a negative correlation with postoperative intermediate vision.
Keywords : Multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lenses, multifocal intraocular lenses, glare test, halos
PureSee Kesintisiz Yüksek Kalitede Görüş
Home
About The Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Contact